Welcome to Stillwater, NJ

Stillwater, New Jersey     Editorial     Power Lines     Stillwater History     Nepotism      
For Immediate Release:  February 3, 2011
 
Contact: 
Kevin Pflug, Eastern Environmental Law Center, 973-424-1479
Hannah Chang, Earthjustice, 212-791-1881 ex 233
Julia Somers, New Jersey Highlands Coalition, 973-588-7190
Jeff Tittel, New Jersey Sierra Club, 609-558-9100
Christine Guhl, Sierra Club, 609-510-4684
 
 
Groups Seek to Reopen Electrical Transmission Line Decision
Construction of line would encourage dirty coal instead of clean energy

 
New York  --  Clean energy advocates asked the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities today to reconsider a decision it made approving construction of a high-voltage electrical transmission line that would run from Berwick, Pennsylvania to Roseland, New Jersey.  The line was approved on the faulty assumption that it would be needed to keep New Jersey’s lights on, but recent developments show this to be incorrect.
 
In April 2010, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities approved the 45-mile New Jersey portion of the line to prevent brownouts and blackouts that were projected to occur beginning in 2012.  But since the Board’s decision, completion of the line has been delayed from 2012 to 2015, and PSE&G, the company that would build the line, has been forced to admit that interim fixes can solve any anticipated reliability issues.
 
“The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities approved this $750 million project because they were told the lights could go out without it.  Now we know that’s not true,” said Julia Somers, Executive Director of the New Jersey Highlands Coalition.   “It’s time to take a fresh look at better and cheaper ways to meet our energy needs.”
 
In addition to the construction delays, PJM Interconnection, the regional grid operator that originally determined the transmission line was needed, last month revised its load forecast down significantly.  PJM has acknowledged that it needs to revisit the alleged need for the PATH project, a similar transmission line, in light of lower load projections.
 
“The bottom line is that we are seeing permanent reductions in electricity demand,” said attorney Kevin Pflug of the Eastern Environmental Law Center.
 
“Energy efficiency and demand response programs are working, and that means we don’t need to pay for big new transmission lines to ship coal-fired power to New Jersey,” said Earthjustice attorney Hannah Chang.
 
The proposed 145 mile high-voltage transmission line is one of several planned lines that would bring power from dirty coal plants in Pennsylvania and West Virginia to urban areas in the mid-Atlantic region. Proposed high-voltage transmission lines running from coal country to Maryland and New Jersey threaten to flood eastern power markets with coal-fired power.  Currently in the Northeast, coal-fired power plays only a minor role in the overall energy mix.
 
Earthjustice is joining the Eastern Environmental Law Center to represent Environment New Jersey, The New Jersey Highlands Coalition, Sierra Club, Stop the Lines, and New Jersey Environmental Federation in seeking to reopen the Board's decision approving the Susquehanna-Roseland line.  These groups intervened in the original proceeding to challenge approval of the line and appealed after the Board approved it.  The appeal is pending before the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court.
 
“New Jersey is in the process of adding thousands of megawatts of electricity from wind, solar, and natural gas; and in the meantime, conservation and efficiency measures are working.  This power line expansion project is not needed and will hurt ratepayers and the environment,” stated Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club.  “The Board needs to reconsider the Susquehanna-Roseland line because it is too costly, unnecessary, and will bring in dirty coal power from Pennsylvania.”
 
“Ratepayers should not be footing the bill to expand these coal-by-wire power lines.  The Board has a responsibility to re-examine the need for this costly project, which will have serious environmental and public health impacts,” said Christine Guhl, Sierra Club Field Organizer.
 
New transmission lines that encourage use of outdated, highly-polluting coal-fired power plants undermine the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cap-and-trade program that promises to reduce electric sector carbon emissions from Maine to Maryland.  RGGI already is boosting energy efficiency and renewable energy development in the states that have agreed to participate in the program.  Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia are not part of the RGGI and facilitating import of dirty electricity from these states to RGGI states undercuts environmental gains achieved through RGGI.
 
Read the motion



Shining a light on power company’s project


Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Parsippany Life
STAFF WRITER
By Cindy Forrest

There are still a few hurdles that Public Service Electric and Gas Co. has to clear before work begins on its proposed Susquehanna-Roseland Transmission Line.

One is an approval by the National Park Service, which has jurisdiction because the chosen route would take the line through the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Appalachian National Scenic Trail and Middle Delaware National Scenic and Recreational River. Another hurdle is the assortment of permits from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection that are required.

Both pose formidable potential obstacles to the future of the $750 million project that would double the height of towers and add a 500-kilovolt line along an existing right of way from Pennsylvania across 46 miles in New Jersey. Starting in Warren County the route travels along an existing right of way to Sussex then on to Morris County where it would wind its way through Jefferson, Rockaway Township, Kinnelon, Boonton Township, East Hanover, Montville, and Parsippany.

However it’s in Parsippany that the mighty power company is facing a third, and perhaps its most formidable obstacle – Eileen Rolnick. Having lived in the shadow of the power line for over 41 years, Rolnick never questioned the safety of the 230-volt line that ran behind her house when she first moved in.

Then her husband, Stanley, who for years sat for hours in his backyard just a few feet away from the power tower, died of cancer at the age of 58. Soon thereafter, a scary pattern seemed to emerge.

"We saw an inordinate number of cancers at very young ages," she said. "My two neighbors in their 40s, husband and wife, were diagnosed with cancer. Across the street, a 31-year-old and a 36-year-old died of cancer and around the corner my friend’s daughter in her 30s died of cancer. It can’t be a coincidence."

Now the prospect of a 200-foot tower and three times the power passing through the lines behind her home have her deeply concerned.

"I pray for a miracle and hope someone will listen," she said.

But praying and hoping aren’t all that the plucky grandmother of five is doing.

So far she’s organized a neighborhood meeting, which brought PSE&G staffers George Sous, a regional public affairs manager, Rich Crouch. project manager. and Kyle King. project engineer. to her backyard; written letters to the Department Health & Human Resources, Department of Environmental Protection, and Department of Community Affairs; and testified on the record at the National Park Service hearings.

Recently she began a door-to-door campaign to raise awareness levels about the project among her neighbors. With neon pink brochures in hand she spends some time in the evenings ringing door bells and asking people whether they are aware of the scope of the planned project.

"This is not an advertisement," the handout states. "There is a project being undertaken by PSE&G without regard or concern for the unknown health risks that have not been fully considered."

The flyer encourages residents to attend meetings and write to elected public officials.

PSE&G has consistently maintained that the electro-magnetic fields emanating from the lines are not a health risk.

On its web site the company states, "The overwhelming body of scientific study shows no definitive link between EMF and human health issues. Since 1977, concerns over magnetic fields and possible health effects have been the subject of numerous scientific and regulatory review panels, and extensive research and studies continue to be funded in this field of study. After nearly 30 years of worldwide research, there are no direct or causal links between electric and magnetic fields and adverse health effects. Magnetic fields from appliances like hair dryers, microwave ovens, and motorized appliances are often stronger than the fields directly beneath power lines. PSE&G will design and install this line according to appropriate state and federal guidelines related to safety and environmental impact."

In conclusion it notes, "In March 2009, the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services issued a letter addressing Rockaway Township's concerns about the potential cancer risk from exposure to EMF. Based on current research findings, the Department of Health and Senior Services believes that the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission line does not pose any long-term health risks."

PJM Interconnect, which controls the power grid for thirteen states including New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and PSE&G have determined that rolling brownouts could occur as early as 2012 if the upgrade to the existing 80-year-old line is not completed.

The planned Susquehanna – Roseland route spans a total of 145 miles from Pennsylvania across northwestern New Jersey along an existing right of way. So far every governmental agency petitioned, including the New Jersey Highlands Council, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, has given PJM Interconnect the approvals that it’s sought.




New, giant power-line towers will soon dot northern New Jersey

By Mark DiIonno

March 28, 2010, 7:32AM

Scott Olson (left), Elliot Ruga (right) and Lisa Chammings (center) stand on Lisa Chammings' Stillwater farm Wednesday. In the background is a line of power towers which were erected in 1929. PSE&G is proposing an upgrade to the lines which would require replacing the towers with new ones, more than doubling the height of the towers. The cellular telephone tower in the background stands 120 feet tall. The power line tower stands 80 feet tall. The proposed power line towers will stand approx 190 ft. tall.

In the northwest corner of the state, where national and state parks converge to form 110,000 acres of natural lands, the High Point Monument, at 220 feet, is the lone structure looming above the tree line.

That may soon change. Power-line towers as high as 195 feet are soon going to soar over treetops in places like the Delaware Water Gap national park, the Appalachian Trail, and the ridges of the Kittatinnys.

But you won’t have to be on a nature excursion to see these monuments to electricity. They’ll be coming to neighborhoods in 16 towns from Sussex to Essex counties; places like Sparta and Jefferson and Montville and Parsippany and East Hanover, where old power lines created health concerns among the residents.

And more may be coming. There are preliminary studies to have the monster towers built in Somerset and Union counties, from Branchburg to Roseland, and climb the Watchungs over to Jersey City.

The march brings to mind the images from Orson Welles’ "War of the Worlds" broadcast, except this invasion isn’t drawing nearly the attention, let alone hysteria.

Despite numerous public hearings and incremental government approvals, the pending construction is news to most people. But once these towers go up, they’ll be impossible to ignore. In many towns they will be the tallest structures — higher than water spheres and cell towers, with the wing span of a Martian vulture.

"These towers will be an aesthetic nightmare," East Hanover Mayor Joseph Pannullo said. "I don’t know why people aren’t outraged over this. I know this: After they go up, plenty of people will say, ‘How did this happen?’"

Last month the state Board of Public Utilities approved PSE&G’s plan to replace 240 squat power-line stanchions with the new towers, which will be more than twice as high and carry more than three times the voltage. Some cities don’t have buildings that high.

PSE&G calls it the Susquehanna-Roseland Project, and new towers will be 165 to 195 feet tall, replacing towers that stand 65 to 80 feet. They will carry 500 kilovolt lines and the current 230 kilovolt lines, doubling the amount of strands from pole to pole.

"Since the existing line was put into service in the early 1930s, electricity usage in New Jersey has increased by more than 2,000 percent," said PSE&G spokeswoman Karen Johnson. "The project is needed for reliability." Three separate analyses, she said, have determined that 23 transmission circuits in North Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania will be overloaded "as early as 2012, resulting in possible brownouts and blackouts."

For 46 miles, from the Delaware west of Millbrook Village down to the big transfer station in Roseland, the towers will be placed about 1,200 feet apart, nearly the length of four football fields. The tallest, at Lake Denmark, will be 240 feet high. From the air, the new towers will look like a giant zipper over hill and dale of the Highlands. On the ground, they will dwarf the tallest oaks not only in height but in the shoulders.

"I don’t think people fully understand how big these towers will be, and how many there will be, and how scenic vistas (of the Highlands) will be impacted by this," said Lisa Chamming, a Stillwater farmer who has two old stanchions on her property. One is on a nearly bare hilltop, one is in valley.

On the ridge to the east, the old stanchions march in straight lines up the hillside like an army of steel soldiers, stealthily below the tree lines. "The new towers will be twice as high as those trees," she said, pointing to the ridge.

About 75 of the new towers will be in the Highlands. The National Park Service is currently reviewing PSE&G’s application for towers within the recreation area, but the state Highlands Council approved it last year, after PSE&G paid a $18.6 million mitigation fee. The money will be used for other preservation programs in the region.

DISTURBANCES

The lines will carry electricity from coal-fired generation plants of Pennsylvania and the Midwest to the metro area. Johnson said the utility is overdue for an upgrade to "address reliability standards" set by the federal government. "Right now we are in violation of these standards," she said.

Critics say those high-use times are extremely rare — only the few very hottest days in summer — and the new lines will be overkill.

"The data PSE&G provided said there are something like 10 hours a year where the grid might go down," said Kevin Duffy, the mayor of Hardwick, who opposes the line.

Deborah Pasquarelli of Greenwich Township, another opponent, was one of two Highlands Council members who voted against the plan.

"There is no way any reasonable, sane person could look at the PSE&G plan and say it was consistent with the Highlands Act," she said. "The Highlands Act, simply put, limits land disturbance so groundwater can be recharged. The land disturbance with PSE&G’s project will be enormous, to say the least."

The major land disturbance will come during construction of the towers.

First, the parts must be trucked in. Since a 195-foot tower is equivalent to a 16-story building, large cranes will be needed to assemble and stand them. Each tower must be sunk 40 feet into the ground for stability, so excavators and other dirt-movers will do the digging.

A Highlands Council report said access roads to the line include dirt paths and old logging roads, and "wind through the forest, across boulder fields, and over fallen tree trunks, and transcend up slopes and down gradients."

Those roads will have to be widened and improved in a number of parks, preserves and other environmentally sensitive areas, beginning with the Water Gap. The line also goes through Kittatinny Valley State Park in Andover, Wildcat Ridge in Rockaway Township, Buck Mountain near Smoke Rise in Kinnelon, and Pyramid Mountain in Montville.

It will either skirt or go over lakes Aeroflex, Mohawk, Hopatcong and Denmark, the Split Rock Reservoir, and the Passaic River wetlands of Troy Meadows in Parsippany and Hatfield Swamp in East Hanover.

"They are going to disrupt a lot of landscape to improve these access roads," said Elliott Ruga, from the preservation group the Highlands Coalition,

In East Hanover there is even a greater concern.

"It’s one thing to protect the environment, it’s another to protect people," Pannullo said. "I’ve talked to our congressmen and all the state officials. People have a way of being polite but doing nothing to help you. PSE&G is very powerful in this state, and big givers" to political campaigns.

The line runs within 200 feet of about 120 homes in East Hanover. For half of those, the lines are essentially in backyards.

"We’ve had seven cancers on this block," said Edie Loehwing, who has a tower in her backyard, practically straddling a storage shed. Her husband, Rich, a retired deputy police chief, had a brain tumor. Her backyard neighbor’s son had brain cancer as boy. A woman down the street died young of breast cancer.

A half-mile away, Ethel Pierson, who lives 100 feet from the line, said she had four cancers in her family. Two of her daughters survived cancer as young adults. Her granddaughter, who lived with Pierson, survived a blood cancer. Her husband died of lung cancer.

Three doors down, a woman has leukemia; another neighbor has colon cancer. A man down the street had a brain tumor removed.

"When I saw they wanted to put in bigger lines, I went door to door, every chance I got, to say, ‘We’ve got to fight this.’" Pierson said.

The health risks of electromagnetic fields are a controversial issue.

"The question of EMF and cancer had been raised by several different studies, and has therefore been studied in depth for over 30 years," said Linda Erdreich, epidemiologist and EMF researcher. "Based on the considerable evidence in the thousands of studies to date, reputable scientific agencies have not concluded that EMF is a cause of any type of cancer."

Pannullo said of power lines: "I’ve read 25 reports saying they are safe, and 25 saying they kill people. But that’s a lot of cancer in one neighborhood. If that’s a coincidence, it’s a hell of a coincidence."

The new towers on the Highlands line may be just the first phase for PSE&G. The utility is studying the need for 500-kilovolt towers from Branchburg in Somerset County to Roseland, and then from Roseland to Jersey City.

"If they get this one through, you know that one’s coming," Pannullo said.



Residents say ‘NO’ to towers
Friday, February 26, 2010
Amy Jefferson
CORRESPONDENT


The National Park Service (NPS) played to a packed house at Camp Jefferson on Wednesday, Feb. 17, during the second of three public meetings on the Susquehanna to Roseland Power Lines Project. Dozens of residents of Jefferson and surrounding communities that would be affected by the transmission line upgrade spoke out against the project.

PHOTO/JOHN R. LUCIANO
Jeffrey Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, was one of the first speakers to voice opposition to the Susquehanna to Roseland Power Lines Project at the Camp Jefferson meeting of the National Park Service, Wednesday, Feb. 17.

"These parkland areas are cathedrals of nature," said Jeffrey Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club. "Constructing these towers would be a desecration of nature."

Most of the more than three dozen speakers were concerned the construction of 200-foot towers would destroy the scenic areas, interfere with wildlife and tourism, and devastate the routes of migratory birds. Many also stated that their own backyards would be impacted, as well as their enjoyment of the Delaware River and Appalachian Trail.

The Susquehanna to Roseland project is a joint venture of PPL Electric Utilities in Pennsylvania and Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) in New Jersey. It would build 500-kilovolt transmission towers along an already existing path of smaller 230-kilovolt towers that run through Warren, Sussex and Morris Counties, ending in Roseland, Essex County.

The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission have approved the project, but the NPS must also agree as the lines would run through federal parkland. NPS must produce an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as to how the project would affect the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, the Middle Delaware National Scenic and Recreational River, and the Appalachian National Scenic Trail.

The utility companies insist this potentially $1.2 billion upgrade is essential to ensure the future reliability of the regions power grid, but many speakers disputed this. Most doubted the need for the project, and some felt the energy being produced would benefit New York City and not New Jersey. Others said better planning and green solutions should be tried. Many feared the construction of the towers, as well as their long-term use, would negatively affect air quality, water quality, and the safety of the surrounding wildlife.

Donald McCloskey, director of environmental policy for PSE&G, said his company understood their concerns, and would do everything possible to mitigate the impact on the environment. He said the project was necessary to avoid rolling brownouts and to maintain the integrity of the region’s electric grid. His statements were echoed by Sean McNamara, Manager of Federal Regulations for industry group PJM. McNamara said many alternatives had been considered, but this was the only way to ensure energy goals for the region would be met.

McCloskey and McNamara’s statements did little to alleviate the opposition. Some speakers questioned the integrity of the two companies involved, along with why the Boards of Public Utilities approved the project so quickly without conducting their own studies. Many felt money and politics played a role, and they were looking to the NPS, a Federal Agency they believed would not be influenced by either, as the last chance to save these areas.

"What we have spent our tax dollars to preserve for the future, one company will rip up for its own profit," said Carl Lazzaro of Fredon. "The people of New Jersey must come together and say, ‘we don’t want it!’"

Resident Paul French described the energy as "dirty coal energy" and questioned "why should we let this yesteryear power be constructed in this green era?" David Walker said that "mitigating money offered by PSE&G to towns affected by the project is an admission of their bad intentions."

Patrick Malone, NPS Project Manager for this project, opened the meeting by saying NPS had an open mind and wanted public input. All comments were to be part of the public record, and everything would go into their thought processes when they drafted the EIS and made their final decision. There would be more chances for public comment on the process, and the actual decision would not be reached until April of 2012 at the earliest.

Many residents cited the historic mission of the National Park Service was to protect the parklands and keep them unimpaired, not mitigate the impairment. Tina Keppler of Stillwater said, "I am surprised I have to stand up here and ask the National Park Service to protect our parkland."

The last speaker of the evening, Tom Coven of Hampton, summed up the sentiments of the crowd best. He said the parkland was sacred and must be protected.

Malone said those interested in the process and development of the EIS can access the scoping report on the Park Service Web site starting this April.



Local residents along power line path
refuse access to PSE&G
 
Photo by Seth Augenstein/New Jersey Herald
On Lisa Chammings' Stillwater farm, the existing power line, right, stands at 75 feet, but is dwarfed by a 130-foot cell towerr, left. The new Susquehanna-Roseland tower, if approved, could be as tall as 190 feet.


Click here to view the Photo Gallery

By SETH AUGENSTEIN
saugenstein@njherald.com
STILLWATER — Public Service Electric and Gas needs to get its new power line through here, but they might find themselves fighting for it, tree by tree and ridge by ridge.
The Susquehanna-Roseland line, which would as much as double the height and more than double the current 45 miles of high-tension line in northwestern New Jersey, is mapped to traverse the longest angle through the 30-square-mile, rural township. The Stillwater stretch, which extends from Hardwick   to Fredon, is rugged; sharp ridges overlook sensitive wetlands areas which are mostly inaccessible by vehicles. Accordingly, PSE&G has reached out to the property owners along the right of way to get access to their towers and wires.  
Only two of the some 16 owners in the township have agreed to those terms, according to the townsfolk. The rest, like Lisa Chammings and Geri Frawley, adamantly vow to oppose the lines on their own terms. They do not belong to opposition groups and they have not hired lawyers — yet — but they maintain that they will oppose the power company every step of the way. Frawley has five acres under the line, and Chammings has 200 acres of farmland split by the line, but they’re equally committed to keeping their land sacrosanct, on principle.
“We’re not going to just not fight this,” Frawley said.
But some of the municipalities and property owners along the line have found saying yes is easier than saying no.
Three municipalities, including Stillwater, agreed to a last-minute offer of hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece to stay out of the power fight two weeks ago. PSE&G has also bought a series of 14 properties along the New Jersey line, including three houses and 11 vacant pieces of land. The total cost of the properties was not available, but the first four properties purchased cost roughly $2 million; two years ago, $535,000 alone was spent on a house in Fredon sitting right underneath the existing lines.
A total of 32 landowners in New Jersey have agreed to let PSE&G come onto their property temporarily to work on the line, in exchange for money. A PSE&G spokeswoman said they’ve only had a “handful” of rejections from individual landowners.
Stillwater Township called an “emergency” meeting just before the power company’s deadline, at which the township begrudgingly put its “pride... in (its) pocket” in accepting $392,000, as Mayor Bill Morrison said at the time.
Chammings, Frawley and other locals balk at the sentiment.
“The pride is you want to fight it — the pride is we’re fighting the battle,” Chammings said Saturday.
“It’s a lack of respect for our fellow citizens in Stillwater,” Frawley said.
But a whole set of outside developments are swirling at the state level which could affect the dispute over the Stillwater terrain. Gov. Chris Christie’s transition teams issued a litany of restructuring reports last week, just after his inauguration. The energy report recommended the Susquehanna-Roseland upgrade be built as proposed by PSE&G. Specifically, it prescribed a “more robust transmission network across the Delaware River and within New Jersey.”
Environmentalists are crying foul about nearly all the transition reports — but in particular the recommendation about the PSE&G power line. Jeff Tittel, the outspoken director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, immediately criticized the stance of the new governor.
“Governor Christie’s energy transmission report was written by the utilities, for the utilities, and at the expense of the environment and consumer,” Tittel said.
PSE&G and grid operator PJM Interconnection have maintained that the $750 million project — which will be ruled upon by the state’s Board of Public Utilities within the next few weeks — is required to avert brownouts.
The argument has not persuaded opponents. In Stillwater, the townsfolk said they’ve kept to themselves so far; but some, like David Cinnater, have begun hiring lawyers to protect their land. They say they are suspicious about what the Susquehanna-Roseland represents.
“The almighty dollar has a lot of power,” Cinnater said

Opponents of $750M N.J. power line project argue towns were paid to drop opposition

By Lawrence Ragonese/The Star-Ledger

January 31, 2010, 7:30AM

When the state Board of Public Utilities again takes up the issue of PSE&G’s proposed North Jersey power line project this week, the room will be filled with adversaries, many of whom refused a recent utility company financial offer that could have silenced them.

"Settlement’’ offers were made this month by PSE&G to 15 towns in Morris, Sussex, Warren and Essex counties along the proposed route of a 45-mile, $750 million high-voltage line upgrade. The utility offered cash payments and reimbursements of hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece to pay to mitigate some of the impacts of the work to be done.

Opponents labeled the offers "bribes’’ to cash-strapped towns to quash opposition. PSE&G termed them a "fair and equitable way to address some concerns towns had with the project.’’

Officials in towns that got offers for money to hire extra police and safety officers, replace trees, repair property damage and other items, said they came with conditions, including dropping opposition to the project and not publicly commenting on it.

Stillwater, Hopatcong and Sparta accepted $392,000, $300,000 and $205,000 respectively.

Thirteen others declined, citing opposition to the project, or saying they did not have time to process offers that required a quick response. Included were Andover Township, Boonton Township, Byram, East Hanover, Fredon, Hardwick, Jefferson, Kinnelon, Montville, Parsippany, Rockaway Township and Roseland.

"It was a blatant attempt to buy our silence,’’ said Carl Lazzaro, deputy mayor in Fredon, one of several towns legally opposing the project.

Montville Mayor James Sandham, whose town declined $423,000, called it a "strategic political move’’ by the utility to get towns to drop opposition.

"But it’s not a monetary issue,’’ he said. "It’s about safety and property values.’’

Officials in Roseland, Jefferson, Kinnelon and Rockaway Township said they literally did not have time to properly assess offers.

"We got the settlement papers only a couple of days before we had to answer,’’ said Kinnelon Mayor Glenn Sisco, whose town does not oppose the line and was offered $140,000. "Our borough attorney did not have time to review it.’’

But Sparta Town Manager Henry Underhill said his town, which faces minimal impacts from the project, welcomed money to offset the expenses that could be incurred.

"It was not a payoff,’’ said Underhill. "We only get money if the project is approved.’’

PSE&G is partnering with Pennsylvania-based PPL Electric Utilities to build the 500-kilovolt Susquehanna-Roseland line with stated goals of maintaining the reliability of the region’s power system, while preparing for future energy needs. New towers would be built along an existing tower route, causing minimal environmental impact, according to the utilities.

Project opponents, however, say the line would harm the environment, make people living near the line ill, and bring power from "dirty’’ coal-burning plants through New Jersey solely to benefit out-of-state power needs and to generate profits.

Confidential offers to towns from PSE&G came a few weeks ago as hearings on the project before the N.J. Board of Public Utilities were winding down. Company spokeswoman Karen Johnson said the money was earmarked to help towns pay for emergency preparedness, plant trees and vegetation, and mitigate impacts such as noise and traffic caused by tower construction.

"No, absolutely not,’’ Johnson said, when asked about allegations the utility was trying to bribe towns to go along with its plans.

Johnson said PSE&G has tried to minimize impacts of the project on towns and residents. Included was a proposal to move a switching station from Jefferson to Hopatcong, saving a tower and avoiding disturbing some wetlands, she said.

The BPU was poised to decide the fate of the project Jan. 15 but agreed to reopen the matter this week to hear testimony on a similar project in the Virginias that was put on hold due to a weak economy and growing energy conservation movement.

The issue of the 276-mile, $1.8 billion Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) high voltage transmission line will be considered at a board meeting Thursday morning in Newark. BPU officials say they are still intent on ruling on the PSE&G project this month.