Welcome to Stillwater, NJ

Stillwater, New Jersey     Editorial     Power Lines     Stillwater History     Nepotism      

Good News! 
Proposed Cell Tower
In Swartswood
DEFEATED!  12/20/11

By LYNDSAY CAYETANA BOUCHAL

lbouchal@njherald.com

STILLWATER - After an arduous nine-month public hearing process, the Township Zoning Board denied the joint application by Nextel and Jersey Central Power and Light to construct a 15-story cell tower in a 7-0 vote Tuesday.

The public erupted into thunderous applause as the final member of the board voted down the proposed 150-foot cell tower that called for more than 11 land-use variances and setbacks.

"It feels fabulous," said Hampton resident Robert Shankman, who was one of four tower opponents to hire an attorney to argue on their behalf.

"We were hoping for seven votes and we got it," said the delighted Shankman.

In March, the 150-foot tower was proposed by Nextel wireless of New York to be built on Swartswood Volunteer Fire Department property off Swartswood Road. Situated on about an acre lot, the tower would have required a zoning variance to be constructed in a residential zone in addition to variances for setback and height requirements for the tower and an equipment shed.

The monopole, which would have been disguised as a flagpole, was part of an agreement between Nextel and Ohio-based First Energy Corp., the parent company of JCP&L, to create a Nextel "push to talk" network, reaching from Ohio to New Jersey, providing communication for work crews operating in the area and also provide service to Nextel customers.

Greg Meese, the attorney for Nextel, could not provide comment on the decision.

In a discussion preceding the unanimous vote, Zoning Board member Eric Powell said the township's setback requirements were "put in our ordinances for reasons." Because they were "so grossly not met," he struggled with voting in favor of the tower.

Among the numerous setback deficiencies was a township requirement stipulating that the tower must be 300 percent of the structure's height, or 456 feet, from residential property. The closet property was 73 feet from the proposed tower, said Shankman's attorney David Owen, a deficiency of 383 feet.

For similar reasons, board member Catherine Feenstra said, "I feel like this isn't a suitable lot."

Board member Jim Stachura added that the applicants did not provide sufficient evidence that the proposed site was an appropriate lot to build such a structure.

While board member Laurence Lockwood believed it was a "logical presumption" that the tower wouldn't fail, a strong argument wielded by many of the tower's opponents, Lockwood's offered an additional concern: aesthetics.

"The (towers disguised as) flagpoles I've seen, they don't look believable because of their size and scale," Lockwood said.

Hampton residents Kenneth Bradley and his wife, Kathleen, were also major players in bringing down the tower. The Bradleys were also represented by Owen.

Kenneth Bradley, who was visiting family in Oregon with his wife Tuesday said he was "ecstatic" to hear the news that was delivered by a friend who attended the meeting.

"I was kind of hoping that would be the decision we'd get - it would be unanimous," he said.

In a statement sent by email to the New Jersey Herald, Kenneth Bradley thanked the board for its decision and the citizen action taken in opposition of the tower.

He wrote, "Unfortunately, the concerns of our citizens are not echoed by our politicians. Had the Stillwater Town Council done their due diligence, this nine-month long ordeal would not have been laid on the Board of Adjustment and would not have caused the citizens of our community to spend tens of thousands of dollars of their own money to defend. Every one of our elected officials, all the county freeholders, District 24 representatives, Mchose, Chiusano, Garrett and our two senators were given more than one opportunity to weigh in on the destruction of the viewshed of the oldest state park in New Jersey and the safety of our citizens. Not one even took the time to look at it.

Hopefully, this case alerts the local townships to review and revise their cell tower regulations in accordance with their comprehensive plans, so that they are well informed and able to deal intelligently and expeditiously when confronted with these applications from large corporations, who are well-equipped with experience and finances to push their agendas through with no regard for our communities."

After hearing the good news, Kenneth Bradley said he and his wife were headed out for a celebratory dinner on the West Coast.






BELOW YOU CAN ACCESS PODCASTS OF TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETINGS.
MORE WILL ADDED ON AN ONGOING BASIS.


   
 The tracks below generally include public comments, questions and the committee's response to those comments or questions.  You can email the track to a friend by clicking on the envelope to the right of the track title.  You can download the track to your computer by clicking the arrow to the right of the track. 






"OLD STILLWATER" 


Remember that two of the committeemen, Charlie Gross and Timmy Fisher, who won the 2010 election, were responsible for:

 

  • (Charlie Gross) Hostility towards the public and a refusal to answer questions



  • Interference with the operation and duty of the Recreation Commission;  Read Kevin Kane's Letter Here! and see the public outcry because of their actions



  •  Questionable "executive sessions" where meeting minutes were redacted (blacked-out) after the fact.  The meeting was advertised "to conduct interviews for the position of Account Clerk and Recreational Commission Members", however, no interviewees were present but a meeting WAS held, excluding the public 

  •  Not attending board and commission meetings regularly enough to adequately and accurately report back to the committee

  •  Multiple appointments of friends to further their own agenda

  •  Eliminating our police department

  • Accepting $392,000 to allow PSE&G to put power lines through Stillwater without a public meeting to discuss the amount of money being offered and whether it was in our best interest.